Adobe Stock

WATERTOWN — The New York Civil Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Prison Project filed suit against Jefferson County on Monday for its denial of prescribed medication to people with opioid use disorder in the county jail.

The civil liberties unions, on behalf of a Watertown man identified as P.G. in court documents, filed a federal lawsuit Monday in United States District Court, Northern District of New York, against Jefferson County, county Sheriff Colleen M. O’Neill, county Undersheriff Brian R. McDermott and Mark Wilson, the facility administrator at Jefferson County Correctional Facility.

The suit claims the county jail’s “blanket” denial of prescribed medication to people with opioid use disorder, including methadone, is discriminatory and is a life-endangering policy. The complaint states P.G. brings the court action under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fourteenth Amendment, Eighth Amendment and New York state Civil Rights and Human Rights Law.

P.G., according to the complaint, is a 35-year-old man who lives in Watertown and has been diagnosed with opioid use disorder, or OUD, for which he’s prescribed daily treatment with methadone. He has been addicted to opioids for more than 15 years — nearly his entire adult life — the complaint states.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines opioid use disorder as “a problematic pattern of opioid use that causes significant impairment or distress.”

P.G. is facing imminent detention at the county jail because he allegedly violated his probation. It remains unclear what P.G. is on probation for, but the complaint states that in December of last year, his probation officer told him he would be arrested soon and that he should expect to be committed to the county jail.

The suit is asking the court, among other things, that P.G. continue to have access to his prescribed methadone treatment during his detention, including the creation of a discharge plan to ensure continued treatment upon his release, as well as reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

“I have been fighting to overcome my opioid addiction for over a decade, and I have tried so many different treatments and programs along the way. Nothing was effective until I was prescribed methadone,” P.G. said in a prepared statement about the lawsuit. “Receiving methadone treatment has changed my life. I’m drug-free, I have a stable job, and I just purchased a home. For the first time in years, I have hope for the future, but all of that could be lost if my medication is interrupted.”

The complaint states that for years, Jefferson County has had an official policy or custom of “categorically” denying methadone treatment for opioid use disorder to people in the jail’s custody unless they are pregnant.

“This blanket ban on methadone treatment not only permits but in fact requires that the jail deny methadone treatment to non-pregnant people, regardless of the consequences,” the complaint states.

Both lieutenants at the county jail could not be reached Monday for comment or to confirm this is policy at the jail.

The complaint claims that a large portion of incarcerated people have opioid use disorder. Roughly 80% of people in jails and prisons have a history of substance use, according to the complaint, and 18.9% of sentenced people in local jails nationwide self-report that they regularly used opioids prior to incarceration.

This is why MOUD — medication for opioid use disorder — is “critical” in jail settings, the complaint states, as people with opioid use disorder face a “dramatically heightened risk of relapse, overdose, and death in the weeks immediately following release.”

The complaint claims that without intervention from the court, Jefferson County jail officials “will use their blanket methadone ban to strip P.G. of his prescribed treatment, disregarding sound medicine, including the broad consensus in the scientific community and the express judgment of his treating physician.

“The effects on P.G. of sudden, forcible withdrawal from methadone cannot be overstated,” the complaint further states. “They will be immediate. They will be excruciating. And they will expose him to a substantial risk of death.”

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Johnson Newspapers 7.1

Recommended for you

(1) comment


First, the media vilifies doctors blaming them for the "overdose" epidemic using the phrase opioid death. Oh, they did die of an opioid overdose. The trouble was, they died of opioids that they bought off the "street."

They picked up prescriptions legitimately given to them by the doctors at their pharmacy because all narcotic prescriptions can only be given electronically. And by the way, the state tracks narcotics like zip code. As soon as the addict gets the meds, they immediately take it to the neighborhood where they can sell it within 15 minutes. In the same neighborhood, they take that cash and within another 10 minutes buy their drug of choice...fentanyl, heroin, etc. They shoot up and within another 10 minutes they are dead. And who paid for the original legitimate prescription that was given to the addict at the appropriate time, with the exact number of pills, dosage, etc. so they could kill themselves? We, the taxpayers did that. Yes we did. The addicts have Medi-cal or Medicaid and that is how they paid for their OD.

About fifteen years ago, the federal government pushed the doctors to give these drugs because, "It is inhumane for people to go through pain." The doctors vehemently objected but the federal government beat them down. Then, when the number of crimes rose up because of the need of the addict to buy drugs from the cartels, well, how convenient.

The “media sharks” were fed the line by the Feds to tell the world that the doctors did it to these poor, poor addicts. And like the sharks that they are which are brainless, not braindead, they willingly fed off the doctors.

As soon as the addict died, before autopsy, the DOJ of the state rushed in the doctors' offices, arrested the doctor and all of his staff. By time the autopsy came in, the doctor had spent over $100,000 in legal fees, bail, etc., locked out of their office, lost any privileges at any hospital, barred from any payments from any insurance company, and barred from ever getting any malpractice insurance. His staff will never be able to get another job. No one, and I mean no one, no company, not even some of you that knew the truth, would have anything to do with that doctor nor speak up to that doctors defense. No. Some of you would find other “attorney sharks” to sue the doctor and bury the doctor forever. Their families? Disgraced. Impoverished. The lives of doctor and his family now destroyed. Now gone. Happy with what you did?

And you expect me to feel sorry for the addict? And the Great White Sharks of the ACLU and other remarkably similar Sharks, well, they got to be in the headlines.

If the ACLU and other sharks like this do not know the truth, then every single "attorney shark" in that group of sharks should have their licenses taken away and never allowed to practice law because what they are doing is not practicing law.... they are looking for another feeding ground. And the “media sharks” led them right to it.

The only way to stop an addiction is to not do any drugs, at all, for a minimum of two years. Let their brains “reimprint.” And if the “legal disaster bar” sharks are seeking “headlines,” prosecute the families of the addicts, their teachers, their principals, their friends when they were kids, their ministers, the insurance companies, drug rehab joints EXCEPTING for psychiatric hospitals, MediCal or Medicaid, and all of us that paid taxes. These are the ones that made the addict this way. WE are the “feeding ground” that all of these sharks should have gone to in the first place. That's all.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.