Netanyahu vows to annex West Bank

Jericho in the West Bank as seen in 2013. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday that he would move to annex much of the occupied West Bank if he is reelected. Rina Castelnuovo/New York Times

JERUSALEM — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he’d annex war-won West Bank territory if reelected next week, in a brazen ploy to bag right-wing votes ahead of the expected knife-edge vote.

The Trump administration will unveil its plan for Middle East peace days after Israel’s Sept. 17 election, and that presents Israel with “a historic, one-time chance to extend Israeli sovereignty over our settlements in Judea and Samaria, and also to other areas important to our security, our heritage, and our future,” he said.

“I ask you to give me a clear mandate to extend Israeli sovereignty over all the settlements,” Netanyahu added.

More than 400,000 Israelis live in over 120 settlements, which account for about 60% of the West Bank. Annexation would deal a body blow to the Palestinians’ dreams of establishing an independent state with the West Bank as its heartland.

On Tuesday, Saeb Erekat, a peace negotiator and now secretary general of the Palestine Liberations Organization, said: “If Prime Minister Netanyahu is allowed to implement his plans of annexation, he would have succeeded in burying even any chance of peace between Palestinians and Israelis. The Israeli, the international community must stop such madness. We need to end the conflict and not to keep it for another 100 years.”

Annexation of West Bank territory, captured in the 1967 Middle East war, had been considered taboo for decades in Israeli politics because of the international outcry it would spark. But as religious and nationalist political parties gained clout, and peacemaking with the Palestinians drifted off the country’s agenda amid continuing Palestinian attacks, the notion has come to resonate with large swaths of the Israeli public.

According to an August poll by the Israel Democracy Institute, 48% of Jewish Israelis and 11% of Arab Israelis would favor such a plan if it were supported by President Donald Trump and his administration. This compares with 28% of Jewish Israelis and 56% of Arab Israelis who oppose the idea.

Netanyahu said the first area to be annexed if he’s reelected would be the Jordan Valley, where Israeli forces now guard the country’s eastern flank with the Hashemite kingdom. There is wide support for such a move in Israel, including on the part of Netanyahu’s top election rival, former military chief Benny Gantz of the Blue and White bloc.

Dangling the prospect of annexation is a gambit Netanyahu has used before. Three days before Israel’s April 9 poll, and again last week, he suggested he’d extend Israeli sovereignty over parts of the West Bank that are home to Jewish settlements if reelected. Polls show his Likud party in a tight race with Blue and White, and Netanyahu has been warning nationalists that if they don’t vote for his slate, then his right-wing government will be toppled.

Endorsing a proposal that has become the battle cry of other hawkish politicians might burnish his nationalist credentials.

“It mostly, I think, is a way to get votes from the right,” said professor Amichai Cohen, dean of the law faculty at Ono Academic College.

———

(Ivan Levingston contributed to this report.)

———

(c)2019 Bloomberg News

Visit Bloomberg News at www.bloomberg.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

—————

PHOTO (for help with images, contact 312-222-4194): Netanyahu

Tribune Wire

Recommended for you

(1) comment

rdsouth

Israel SHOULD annex the entire West Bank and Gaza. And then make all the people living there into Israeli citizens, regardless of religion. Put Palestine out of its misery. People have a right to live in a real country that they have a vote in rather than be governed without voice. But it looks like the plan is to annex without taking in the people, manifest destiny style. But there's nothing to be done for it. As with other things, the way to deal with international problems is through international institutions, and if they aren't up to it the first step is to improve international institutions. Which doesn't seem to be on the agenda any more than a benevolent one state solution.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.