NEW YORK — New York is joining three other states in appealing a court decision against their lawsuit over a federally-instated cap on state and local tax deductions, otherwise known as SALT.

Attorney General Letitia James and Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced Tuesday that they filed an appeal in their suit against the Republican-backed 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which capped the state and local tax deductions at the first $10,000 — a threshold too low for some wealthier New York property owners.

“This cap has already put a heavy burden on the hard-working, middle-class families of New York, and, in the years ahead, it is expected to cost New York’s taxpayers over $100 billion, which is why we will fight this senseless and unconstitutional law,” James said in a press release.

The initial lawsuit against the bill, filed in July 2018 alongside New Jersey, Connecticut and Maryland, argued that the SALT cap purposely targeted New York and other states because of their high property taxes, would harm taxpayers and interferes with states’ fiscal decisions.

U.S. District Judge Paul Oetken dismissed the case in September, saying that like any federal decision, some taxpayers and states would be more affected than others.

“The cap, again like every other feature of the federal tax code, is a part of the landscape of federal law within which states make their decisions as to how they will exercise their own sovereign tax powers,” Oetken wrote in his decision.

Cuomo called the cap “retribution politics,” and joined James in claiming that New York was being “bullied” into paying more in federal taxes than they already are as one of the nation’s top donors.

“We will not allow this administration to pick the pockets of hard-working New Yorkers to fund tax cuts for corporations and send even more money to red states,” he said in Tuesday’s press release.

E.J. McMahon, research director for the Empire Center, an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank based in Albany, thinks the lawsuit and appeal will fail.

“This is not a serious legal case, it’s a political gesture,” he said. “I’m not a fan of the cap but there’s just no case here.”

Elected officials have already exhausted multiple attempts to circumvent the 2017 tax bill or minimize the effects it would have on New York taxpayers.

Cuomo, for example, created charitable donation funds that would give tax credits equal to 95% of a contribution. The IRS then issued regulations that block governments from giving tax credits for charitable contributions — a move than U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-NY, tried and failed to reverse by forcing a Senate floor vote last month under the Congressional Review Act.

McMahon said if anything, the IRS ruling may have a shot at being legally challenged because it was promulgated in a “confused and confusing” manner.

Massarah Mikati covers the state Legislature and immigration for Johnson Newspaper Corp. Email her at, or find her on Twitter @massarahmikati.

Johnson Newspapers 7.1

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.