Ogdensburg accepts 2020 audit

Ogdensburg City Hall. Christopher Lenney/Watertown Daily Times

OGDENSBURG — The City of Ogdensburg has retained a law firm to represent itself and its mayor against a federal lawsuit filed by residents claiming their constitutional rights have been violated after being blocked on the mayor’s Facebook page.

In a statement released Friday evening, City Manager Stephen P. Jellie stated that the city had retained the law firm of Coughlin & Gerhart, LLP, to represent both Mayor Jeffrey M. Skelly and the city against a lawsuit filed on Aug. 20 in U.S. District Court, Plattsburgh, by what he calls is a small group of “local government disruptors” in Cynthia Layng, Douglas Loffler, Brian Mitchell and Angela McRoberts.

The city residents are represented by the law firm of Gleason, Dunn, Walsh & O’Shea of Albany. The plaintiffs allege that the mayor’s act of “blocking” citizens from participating in the ongoing discussions regarding the affairs and policies of the city “constitutes viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution,” according to the complaint.

“The City will defend itself and the Mayor vigorously against these charges and remains confident that all its actions taken since January 2020 are in the best interest of the entire city, it’s taxpayers and residents and more important they uphold the law,” wrote Mr. Jellie.

Mr. Jellie claims that these “disruptors” attack city government because they are angry over the 2019 election where then Mayor Wayne Ashley and councilors David Price and Jennifer Stevenson were defeated.

“Since taking office in January 2020, Mayor Jeffrey M. Skelly and the Majority City Council received a challenge on each and every action taken to save the city from financial ruin and remove the cronyism and mismanagement that reigned during the previous administration. For months this group has been seeking a “silver bullet” to force the resignation or removal of the Mayor and Majority Councilors to no avail,” wrote Mr. Jellie.

Mr. Jellie concluded his statement by saying that the city will not be intimidated by calls for boycotts against city businesses and individuals “that support change” and it will not “allow favored employee labor unions to control the city’s financial future.”

“This behavior is not that of citizenry voicing concern and participating in government, it is simply weak attempts to instill fear, create anxiety and disrupt progress in a city that needs drastic change in order to survive and ultimately revive,” he concluded.

Court documents state that the plaintiffs demand a jury trial and that the plaintiffs are seeking “injunctive relief” prohibiting Mr. Skelly from blocking them from his Facebook profile as well as compensatory and punitive damages as well as for Mr. Skelly to pay for legal fees associated with the lawsuit.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Johnson Newspapers 7.1

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Joseph Savoca

Supreme Court tosses dispute over Trump blocking critics on Twitter

BY MELISSA QUINN

APRIL 5, 2021 / 10:07 AM / CBS NEWS

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-dismisses-trump-twitter-block-case/

The New York-based 2nd Circuit found Mr. Trump's decision to block seven users from interacting with his Twitter account was unconstitutional, as the space associated with the former president's account was a designated public forum.

Earlybird

So why is the City taxpayers paying for Skelly's attorney? He made the decision to not allow people to express their opinion on his personal page by blocking them. Skelly freely gives his one-sided lie-ridden twisted tales of City Government. Plus the taxpayers have to pay the highest paid ever Unqualified City Manager to protect Skelly and the majority Council by issuing press releases in Skelly's name that lack many facts. They seem to think the "disrupters" are a small group; I guess if they keep saying whatever they want then they think everyone will believe them. This one-sided storytelling is the basis of this lawsuit and possibly many more.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.