A burger at Table, Donkey & Stick in Chicago. The livestock industry says consumers prefer beef to plant-based alternatives. Scientists say beef production is a big contributor to climate change. John J. Kim/Chicago Tribune

Fair warning: This column is written by someone who doesn’t practice what he’s about to preach.

Which is to say, I’m not a vegetarian or vegan, I enjoy a good burger or steak, and I remain unpersuaded by the emerging business of plant-based meat substitutes.

Yet I couldn’t help but smirk when I read a recent report commissioned by the industry-funded Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and Research Board.

Titled “Impacts of New Plant-Based Protein Alternatives on U.S. Beef Demand,” the report finds, not surprisingly, that “beef has a good image,” and that “consumers’ perceptions of taste, appearance, price and naturalness of beef greatly exceeds that for plant-based proteins.”

That’s undoubtedly true. Americans have a long history of beef consumption, and that’s not going to change any time soon.

However, hypocritical though it may seem, I want to take a moment to spell out why plant-based meat alternatives are a good thing and why they represent an important step toward addressing climate change and protecting the planet.

“Consumers can now see the climate crisis happening right before their eyes,” said Jillian Fry, an assistant professor of health sciences at Towson University.

“I think there’s a new urgency for ordinary Americans to consider the benefits of plant-based meat alternatives,” she told me.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the agriculture sector was responsible for 10% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions as of 2018.

Much of those emissions came from animal agriculture — primarily gases emitted by ruminants such as cows and sheep (yes, we’re talking about methane-rich farts and burps, deal with it).

Fry said those 2018 EPA figures are, if anything, a conservative reflection of current emission levels.

“If you factor in the environmental impact of growing feed for livestock and water use, it’s clear that this is a very resource-intensive industry,” she said.

I shared the “beef is good” study with a number of experts in agriculture and climate change.

Most agreed with Fry that if consumers want to focus on the environmental impact of eating meat, they should be aware that things are more complex, and troublesome, than what the livestock industry might have you think.

Hannah Landecker, director of UCLA’s Institute for Society and Genetics, called the Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and Research Board “hardly a neutral party” on this subject.

She said the livestock industry appears to be trying to obfuscate the environmental impact of its products by, in effect, giving consumers permission to avoid dietary changes by validating cultural perceptions that things aren’t as bad as pesky tree huggers might be saying.

To be sure, sales of plant-based meat alternatives from the likes of Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods are rapidly growing as the products are adopted by the fast-food industry and are becoming a staple of supermarket chains.

Sales of plant-based meat alternatives have surged since the outbreak of the pandemic. One study by the Good Food Institute noted a 454% increase in sales last March compared with a year before.

Even so, plant-based sales remain a small fraction of meat sales — about $1 billion as of last year compared with nearly $100 billion for the real thing.

But the growth is nevertheless noteworthy, and that’s what appears to be getting the attention of the livestock industry.

Hence the new industry-backed study finding that “consumers perceive beef to be overall better for farmers, consumers, rural communities and food prices than plant-based alternatives.”

Livestock companies have found a friend in UC Davis animal science professor Frank Mitloehner, who has repeatedly made the case for why cows and sheep aren’t as environmentally harmful as some would believe.

All other experts I spoke with agreed with Harvard University researcher Samuel Myers, who said “the global environmental footprint associated with meat consumption is enormous.”

“Producing protein and nutrients using plant sources has been shown to have a much lower ecological footprint,” he told me. “If we are to feed a world of 10 to 11 billion people healthy diets without destroying the biosphere, a shift to more plant-based diets will be an essential adjustment.”

Each expert said they expect American diets to gradually change as global efforts to combat climate change accelerate, especially now that President Biden has embraced the cause.

Gidon Eshel, a research professor of environmental physics at Bard College, noted that even though the cattlemen’s study put a beef-friendly spin on things, the underlying survey of 3,000 adults indicated growing consumer acceptance of plant-based alternatives.

“Beef is by far the most resource-intensive way anyone can get a nutrient,” Eshel said. “If you want to make a simple change to your diet to protect the environment, there’s nothing you can do that comes anywhere close to forgoing beef.”

What if I and all other burger-loving Americans skipped one of those burgers and had a plant-based alternative instead? Would that help?

“Yes!” Eshel replied. “That would make a big difference.”

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Tribune Wire

Recommended for you

(5) comments

JohnMcElroy

Which came first the cow or the automobile?

rdsouth

I believe the buffalo and mastadon preceded both, vast herds of them like a carpet across the plains the world. Sort of like feed lots, really. The cause of global warming is not cows.

Charlie McGrath

Climate change, climate change, OMG. To believe that we can mitigate climate change is ridiculous. Growing crops uses lots of fossil fuels, petroleum based fertilizers, energy to process foods, and lots of fossil fuels to distribute the vegetables. This climate change hysteria is nothing more than another way to try to control the people. Climate change has been happening long before homo sapiens-sapiens evolved. Glaciers were a couple miles thick over the northern US. How did they melt without cow flatulence? Stop distributing manure for rhetoric.

rdsouth

I find that with many things it's much easier to drastically reduce something than to quit entirely. When you realize you drink too much, cut back to once a month. Same with beef. Keep it special.

KRobbins

Vegetarian is good for you and the planet and animals. Morningstar fake meat stuff is really good. There are some others, too. Haven’t tried Beyond or Impossible products.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.