Here’s why pandemic life is much better in Texas

Cynthia M. Allen

FORT WORTH, Texas — On May 2, 2011, Lafayette Square, the park directly across from the White House, was filled with euphoric throngs of young people, celebrating something they thought might never come to pass.

An elite team of U.S. Navy SEALs had just achieved the impossible: They killed Osama Bin Laden, the elusive international terrorist responsible for the murders of thousands of Americans a decade prior.

In his remarks announcing the operation, President Barack Obama called the men who carried it out examples of “professionalism, patriotism and unparalleled courage.” Knowing what they endured — not just the years of arduous training but the mental obstacles they no doubt overcame to enter into a mission from which they might not return — who could disagree?

Fast forward 10 years, and President Joe Biden might.

At least 35 of America’s most elite military personnel are unvaccinated against COVID-19, a sin so grievous that the president has intimated it renders them (and others like them) unpatriotic. For this reason alone, he believes, they should be fired.

Thankfully, a federal judge in Fort Worth doesn’t see it that way. More importantly, the Constitution provides protection against such thinking. Last week, Judge Reed O’Connor blocked the Biden administration from taking deleterious employment action against the 35 Navy members who sought and were denied religious exemptions from the president’s vaccine mandate for the military.

“There is no COVID-19 exception to the First Amendment,” wrote O’Connor, a George W. Bush appointee. “There is no military exclusion from our Constitution.”

The almost three dozen servicemen who filed suit cited their Christian beliefs as the reason for forgoing the vaccine. People of faith may disagree about moral questions surrounding the development of and decision to take or not take the vaccine. But legal protections for those seeking an exemption based on sincerely held religious beliefs are not up for debate; they are clearly enshrined in our Constitution.

Still, the military under the Biden administration has reduced the procedure for seeking religious accommodation to what O’Connor calls little more than “theater.” The Navy’s 50-step process — yes 50 steps — is set up to deny requests the moment they begin, he wrote.

Yet the mandate “treats comparable secular activity [such as medical exemptions] more favorably than religious activity.” A medical exemption does not deny a servicemember the opportunity to be deployed, for example. But a religious exemption would render its recipient “medically disqualified” from duty.

Makes sense, doesn’t it?

Equally troubling is the revelation that the servicemembers in the case are already enduring what the court characterized as irreparable harm, some simply because they sought a religious exemption. Several have been denied promotions and training opportunities while their exemption requests languished.

In a most egregious case, one SEAL was denied treatment at a military health facility for deployment-related traumatic brain injury while his exemption request was under review. It was eventually denied, along with the 34 other SEALs’ requests. A former Special Forces commander has estimated the cost of training a SEAL or other member at about $1.5 million.

Serious constitutional questions aside, that the government would so flippantly dispose of such an investment is pure folly, especially when the holdouts represent such a vanishingly small (0.6 percent) fraction of the Navy. Never mind that these are people with families — medical needs — and otherwise distinguished careers.

Then again, not much about the Biden administration’s COVID policy makes sense. It continues to threaten the livelihoods of many Americans by insisting they take a vaccine that isn’t doing what they said it would — stop wide transmission.

The delta variant resulted in a demonstrably large number of so-called “break-through” cases, and now the omicron variant is piercing even boosted immunity, at an alarming rate (though vaccines still prevent many cases of serious illness). It’s only a matter of time before the administration realizes that the wheels have fallen off.

But I expect the courts will get there first. And I look forward to euphoric throngs celebrating in the streets when they do.

Cynthia M. Allen is a columnist for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Readers may send her email at Distributed by Tribune Content Agency. © 2022 Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Tribune Wire


Recommended for you

(2) comments


Can we get advance lists of what various religions want exempted, and apply those exemptions consistently? I mean, shouldn't the doctrines of a faith have some rationale? An example might be "medical treatment thwarts God's will". In that case, all medical treatment would be shunned, right? If it just takes an individual's deeply held belief" is that really religious? Can I believe that property is theft and use that to exempt me from laws banning stealing? The supreme court should be able to strike down laws on the basis that they are unconstitutional, not pick and choose applications of laws (this person wants to act on an idiosyncratic belief), except on the basis of whether the application obeys a valid law. Does compelling vaccination interfere with free exercise of a religion banning vaccination? It depends on how the mandate is set up. If the service member has a right to opt out without criminal liability, the service member can still exercise religion. The constitution doesn't require that exercise of religion be convenient, just that it be possible.

Joseph Savoca

These unelected activist judges shouldn't be legislating from the bench.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.