Culture, not Trump, created El Paso shooter

Cynthia M. Allen

FORT WORTH, Texas (Tribune News Service) — There are a lot disappointing elements in the story of Georgia Clark, the Fort Worth Carter-Riverside High teacher whose recent social media tirade about unauthorized immigrants prompted FWISD’s board of trustees to recommend that she be terminated.

Clark, an English teacher, was apparently quite concerned by the number of students at the high school where she teaches (whom she believed) to be in the country illegally. She was so alarmed that she personally took her pleas that these students be “removed” to President Donald Trump, via her Twitter account, and even supplied her phone number so someone on his staff could call her to discuss the problem.

The real problem was that Clark did not understand how to properly use Twitter. What she thought were direct messages, for Trump’s eyes only, were public posts. Disappointing.

Clark is entitled to express her views; that’s not the issue here. We may graciously grant that Clark’s Twitter rant was an honest mistake, but her personnel file illustrates a pattern of intolerant behavior toward students; she was moved to another campus after a previous incident. It’s a disappointment, really, that the district failed to act more decisively until now.

And while Clark is not a civics teacher, she is an educator. She should know that children are guaranteed access to public education regardless of their citizenship status. There was a U.S. Supreme Court case about it involving Texas, after all.

Perhaps the most disappointing thing about the Georgia Clark saga is how leftists will use it as fodder in the culture war against conservatives. It’s happened countless times before — Rep. Todd Akin’s absurd comments that a woman’s body can prevent pregancy in cases of “legitimate rape” come to mind. Comments from the fringes are conflated as being mainstream conservative ideology, even when legitimate policy questions — and lots of mainstream opposition — underlie the pertinent issue.

Far more importantly, is how this framing — “See! They’re all ignorant bigots!” — gets replicated against conservatives even when the subjects are completely reasonable people making completely reasonable, widely believed arguments. It happens during important constitutional debates, such as whether a person with sincere religious objections can be forced to bake a cake for a gay wedding; and in more ordinary instances, such as when an elderly white woman’s silent rosary outside an abortion clinic is broadcast by a hateful activist on social media as illustrative of white supremacy. The intent is to drive anyone who dissents from “progressive” thinking out of the public square.

This is the world that conservatives are living in. And it’s the context in which the great right-of-center intellectuals of the day are debating how conservatives should respond to this deluge of ruthless illiberalism from the left.

Those following the Sohrab Amari/David French debate know that it already has generated thousands of column lines in publications and social media platforms, and it deserves a greater airing than I can give before this column closes. An abridged summary of the argument is whether small-l liberalism — the philosophy from which stems our democratic government — is still relevant in a nation that no longer has shared moral values.

Those on the French side of the debate believe that rights — such as free speech and free exercise — should be secured through traditional, liberal channels and focus on individual liberty and autonomy.

Amari’s supporters take a harder stand. Having watched their side incur defeat after defeat, and seeing their fellow conservatives ridiculed and punished by so-called conservatives, they perceive the goal of the ongoing “culture war” as “defeating the enemy and enjoying the spoils in the form of a public square re-ordered to the common good and ultimately the Highest Good.”

It’s a fascinating and necessary debate. One deserving of its own column.

One thing is for sure: Conservatism, however it moves forward, is not helped by people like Georgia Clark. The conservative mainstream has enough to handle, in dealing with the left and managing its own internal struggles. But it will have to continue to fend off the fringes as well.

Cynthia M. Allen is a columnist for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Readers may send emails to Visit Fort Worth Star-Telegram at Distributed by Tribune Content Agency. © 2019 Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

Tribune Wire


Recommended for you

(4) comments


As the Conservative magazine “The National Review” said: the election of Donald Trump proves everything Democrats ever said about Republicans. Trump was openly racist on the campaign trail, if you voted for him you are racist. Cut the political correctness.


We don't know until we witness. This teacher sees and says no these kids arn't in the country legally and shouldn't have the privelege of a free education. On the other hand schools in general enjoy state and federal money according to their student count. President Trump most likely will not pull kids out of Texas schools its a Texas issue. Texas tolerates hispanics they do lots of work down there.

hermit thrush

"Perhaps the most disappointing thing about the Georgia Clark saga is how leftists will use it as fodder in the culture war against conservatives." by the same token, perhaps the most disappointing thing about this column is how non-republicans will take it as exhibit 89 million for how the gop is a party based on self-centeredness and personal aggrievement. if you're thinking about an incident like the one involving the teacher in this column, and your primary concern is that it makes your side look bad, then something is seriously off in your moral calibration.


"Perhaps the most disappointing thing about the Georgia Clark saga is how leftists will use it as fodder in the culture war against conservatives." That's the most disappointing thing? Oh boy

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.