Stefanik is saying that lying is freedom of speech

U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-Schuylerville, addresses questions Oct. 10 during a Coffee with your Congresswoman session at the Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 6912 in Lowville. Julie Abbass/Watertown Daily Times

GLEN FALLS — Twitter recently banned political ads.

But what it really did was rid itself of lying politicians. That is the real problem facing social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter.

So Twitter got out of the business. Good for them.

Twitter’s CEO, Jack Dorsey, said at the time that political ads include “unchecked, misleading information, micro-targeting and deepfakes,” which change video, audio and other images so the consumer is unable to determine what is real and what is not. The Twitter folks had the courage to say they didn’t know how to police it.

Rep. Elise Stefanik seemed especially concerned about the Twitter rights of her constituents in the 21st Congressional District this week, even though only 22 percent of adults in the U.S. use Twitter. I suspect even fewer use it in the 21st Congressional District.

If you are not familiar with Twitter — and I suspect many of you are not — it is an app you can get on your phone that allows you to post comments as long as they are fewer than 280 characters. You can follow any number of people on Twitter and they can follow you. That’s how you get to see each other’s tweets.

Rep. Stefanik was concerned enough about Twitter banning political ads that she posted seven tweets Monday morning in rapid succession. She said she believes that “individuals, organizations and campaigns should be able to share their message directly to voters.”

You should pay attention to that. What she is saying is that she wants an unfiltered message that is not open to questions or scrutiny from traditional reporters in the media.

She actually told the Adirondack Daily Enterprise that in a phone interview when they asked her about Facebook’s policy of not removing paid advertisements that spread misinformation. She told the Daily Enterprise she wants Facebook to remove falsehoods posted by foreign influencers but not domestic campaigns. That is stunning. She opposes lying by foreign entities, but she believes that misinformation from American politicians is fine.

“There are examples where there is disinformation from foreign nations; we absolutely need to crack down on that,” Rep. Stefanik told the Daily Enterprise. “But when it comes to campaigns and candidates, we’re responsible for the content that we’re putting out there.”

Unfortunately, Rep. Stefanik has not lived up to her end of the bargain. She has a spotty record in this regard, as media fact checks have found some of her campaign ads to be, at best, misleading, and, at worst, outright lies.

The editorial board of this newspaper asked her several months ago to make a commitment that she would not lie in her campaign ads. The editorial board never heard back from Rep. Stefanik.

In the same interview with the Daily Enterprise, she said she believes voters can determine whether an advertised political message is true or not.

At best, that is naive thinking, at worst it lays the groundwork to employ misinformation through her campaign ads. This appears to be a strategy for the long term, so she can do fewer appearances and town hall meetings with the voters. She will instead use social media to connect with voters.

Rep. Stefanik makes an argument with her tweets that political ads on social media allow underfunded challengers to compete. I suggest addressing campaign finance reform to level the playing field is a better use of her time, but I doubt that is being considered.

What is so appalling is that the real issue here is not “freedom of speech” for political candidates, but their inability to tell the truth in their own advertising. And worse, Rep. Stefanik thinks that is OK.

Considering all that is going on in Washington, and all the problems confronting residents of the 21st Congressional District, Rep. Stefanik might want to spend her energy on something more important than what Twitter chooses to allow on its platform. If you agree or don’t agree, you should tweet about it. It may be the only way that Rep. Stefanik will get the message.

Ken Tingley is editor of the Post-Star in Glens Falls and writes a regular blog called “The Front Page.” Readers may send emails to

Johnson Newspapers 7.1


Recommended for you

(5) comments


Twitter should be ashamed. As for lying..they all do. Stop it with one party lying

“You can keep ur plan, u can keep your doctor.”

“It was a YouTube video”

“We have evidence that the trump campaign collided with Russia.”

And on and on

TRump in no way has the market cornered on this. At least hunter Biden admitted his dad got him the job and it was wrong. I can respect that.

“Tulsi gabbard is a Russian agent” lol. Shameful.

hermit thrush

As for lying..they all do.

no they don't. or more precisely, one party is much much worse, as is well illustrated by you own comment: most of the examples you produced are fake.

“It was a YouTube video” -- this is what the initial benghazi intelligence reports said, and the final report confirmed that the video played a role.

“We have evidence that the trump campaign collided with Russia.” -- this is and remains 100% true. there is and remains a lot of evidence of collusion. what mueller did not find is sufficient evidence rising to the level of a criminal conspiracy charge. (which also does not mean such evidence doesn't exist, especially given the vicious obstruction campaign waged by trump and his toadies.)

“Tulsi gabbard is a Russian agent” -- no one actually said this. hillary clinton said that republicans, not russians, were grooming gabbard for a third-party run. it got misreported in the press and was then lapped up by people like you.

the obama quote you produced is legit. it was wrong of him to say that. but now stack that up against the ocean of lies coming out of trump and the gop -- it's not even close. it takes an irrational hatred of democrats not to see the difference.

hermit thrush

from the roger stone trial today:

Anthony DeRosa🗽

Former deputy Trump campaign chairman, Rick Gates said in open court today at the Roger Stone trial that Trump directly informed by Stone about upcoming Wikileaks releases.

The campaign also coordinated and planned their efforts around Wikileaks releases.

that's your collusion right there. was it illegal? probably not. just bottomlessly corrupt and treasonous. and the airballs of the world will keep making excuses for it.

Kevin Beary

It is understandable that some "traditional journalists" should lament the passing of the days when the only way for people to hear what politicians had to say was through certain outlets.

Richard Nixon, after losing the California gubernatorial race in 1962, complained about media bias against him while recognizing his powerlessness against such bias in remarks that have come down to us as "Nixon's Last Press Conference":

"I leave you gentlemen now, and you will write it. You will interpret...But...[y]ou won’t have Nixon to kick around anymore...I believe in reading what my opponents say, and I hope that what I have said today will at least make television, radio, and the press, first recognize the great responsibility they have to report all the news and...put one lonely reporter on the campaign who will report what the candidate says now and then."

In these days of social media, some traditional journalists are no longer able, as they were in Nixon's day, to filter all statements made by politicians before these statements reach the public, but they are still free to question and scrutinize such statements, as does the writer in his column, and as he does incessantly in his own newspaper.

hermit thrush

gop, the party of lies.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.