Chauvin trial cannot vindicate America

On the third day of the trial of former Minneapolis police officer, Derek Chauvin, prosecution shows the jury and the witness on the stand the split screen of security footage (left) and bystander video of the arrest of George Floyd. Chauvin was captured on tape on May 25, 2020, pressing his knee onto Floyd’s neck for more than nine minutes during an arrest. Chauvin was later charged with second-degree murder and manslaughter. Floyd’s death sparked outrage all around the world and resulted in massive protests against police brutality and racism. Pool Video Via Court Tv/Ny Times/ZUMA Wire/TNS

America is on trial.

Or at least, that is the conviction of many observers as Derek Chauvin, a white former Minneapolis police officer, faces judge and jury in the death of George Floyd, a 46-year-old African-American man. America on trial: it’s a headline in Time, the Toronto Star and Agence Marocaine De Presse, a news agency in Morocco. It’s the considered opinion of CNN’s Don Lemon, the Rev. Al Sharpton and of a group of black barbers in Washington, D.C., who were interviewed by NPR.

It is also the view of Philonise Floyd. “America is on trial,” says Philonise, brother of George, who died last year lying handcuffed in the street for nine and a half excruciating minutes, unresisting and crying out for his mother as Chauvin pressed a knee into his neck. “If you can’t get justice for this as a Black man in America, what can you get justice for?”

It is not difficult to understand why many of us believe that what happens in that courtroom will render a verdict not just on Chauvin, but on the nation, on our self-appraised land of truths held self-evident, equality under the law, liberty and justice for all. Is any of that real? Does any of it mean anything? Many of us are looking to that Minneapolis courtroom for answers.

America is on trial, they say. Well, maybe it is. But here is a contrarian view: This trial cannot vindicate America.

Let’s assume for a moment Chauvin is acquitted. What message does that send? The answer is obvious. It sends the same message that has been sent for four centuries: that for African Americans, justice remains elusive, nearly impossible, especially in cases of police wrongdoing.

Maybe you think the message changes if Chauvin is convicted. But does it, really?

Consider what that conviction will have required. The killing took place in broad daylight, seen by a crowd of onlookers whose cellphone video turned us all into eyewitnesses. We all heard Floyd’s moaning pleas; all saw the chilling nonchalance in Chauvin’s face. Cities around the world convulsed in outrage.

If it takes that excess of evidence and that level of public pressure for Chauvin to be convicted, would that really attest to the integrity of American justice toward African-American people? Or would it not ultimately say pretty much the same thing an acquittal would: that for us, justice is harder, the bar higher, the road steeper, especially where allegations against the police are concerned.

Unequal justice is not justice at all. Yet that’s precisely what we have so often seen, unarmed Black women, children and men killed, and cops, time after time, excused.

Don’t misunderstand. The view from this corner is that Chauvin very much deserves conviction and incarceration. The hope is that he receives both. But let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that would say something about American justice that it simply would not.

All it would say is that in a crime committed before the entire world and with the entire world watching, America — or at least, a jury of 12 Americans — could not bring itself to deny a self-evident truth. That’s no inspiring affirmation of national values. Rather, it’s the bare minimum common humanity demands. And again: It’s entirely possible the court will do even less than the minimum and acquit Chauvin, an outcome that experience tells us is hardly inconceivable.

So no, America is not on trial here. Derek Chauvin is, and we await the verdict. But as to America?

That verdict is already in.

Leonard Pitts Jr. is a columnist for the Miami Herald, 3511 NW 91st Ave., Miami, Fla., 33172. Readers may contact him via email at

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Johnson Newspapers 7.1

Recommended for you

(1) comment


Yes, I read the Pitts drivel. He hates America. I wonder if he would rather live somewhere else. Enough time wasted on Lenny. I get the paper paper. At the top of D3, where Leonard is, it says Left/Right/Center. Underneath, Pitts is Max Boot, a self avowed hater of Republicans who claims he used to be one. One thing he is not, is a Centrist. He is a Joe Scarborough clone. There are 222 sq in of copy space on the page. 150 sq in are dedicated to Lefties. The remaining 72 is dedicated to Hugh Hewitt, who is on the Right side of the spectrum. A full two thirds is Leftist propaganda. The Times has become wool pullers. You know, they've been pulling the wool over our eyes. How about finding a real Centrist for the bottom section. Not Boot or Rubin. They are Centrist posers. The WDT has been drifting leftward for 20 years. Can they turn the newspaper back toward the views of North Country conservatives enough to save the paper from ideological suicide?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.