The ex-officials are piling up, and the sycophants’ job gets harder

From left, national security adviser John Bolton, Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats, FBI Director Christopher Wray, Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen and National Security Agency Director Paul Nakasone attend a White House news briefing in August 2018. Only Wray and Nakasone still have their jobs. MUST CREDIT: Washington Post photo by Jabin Botsford

One of Republicans’ most frequent rationalizations for supporting President Donald Trump, a blatantly unfit commander in chief, was that “the best people” he picked would keep everything on the level. Men such as Jim Mattis, John Kelly, Daniel Coats and H.R. McMaster would keep things normal.


Well then, John Bolton.


How to explain both vouching for Trump by relying on senior advisers and still supporting him when he summarily dismisses them for weird ideas like preserving NATO, keeping the Taliban out of Camp David, demanding we address Kim Jong Un’s resumption of missile tests (despite the love letters), refusing to abandon the Kurds abruptly in Syria and objecting to a replay of the Kim debacle in the form of Trump talks with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani?

You see, all of those positions are deeply (if quietly) held by the uber-hawks, who for years have been calling Democrats fools and weaklings when it comes to national security. Now they face a dilemma: Trump’s positions, the ones about which he clashed with his advisers, are insane from the vantage point of those same Republican hawks.

Someone should ask Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., or Ted Cruz, R-Texas, whether Trump’s instinct to bring the Taliban up to Camp David was brilliant or idiotic. Maybe Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., can explain — especially to South Carolinians hurt by Trump’s trade war — why he doesn’t favor grabbing back the power to levy tariffs.

A former national security officials tells me, “John Bolton was unpopular in many foreign policy circles, but he had consistent principles and stood up for them, including against the president. That’s a lot more than you can say for just about everyone else in the president’s circle.” And that’s the problem with those left in the administration as well as Republicans on the Hill.

I am 100 percent certain these Senate Republican believe Trump’s ideas are loony and dangerous, but they will refuse to speak out against arguably the stupidest idea (inviting the Taliban over) to pop into Trump’s head (and there is stiff competition). Cruz, in a series of mind-numbing tweets, pretended this was all the work of the Deep State. His assumption that voters are dumb enough to buy this is disturbing, but not as disturbing as his need to push out gibberish to maintain the facade of Trump’s normalcy.

The Fox News hosts and the rest of the right-wing media will either ignore or praise Trump — while trying to avoid endorsing the idea that a Camp David invite was just the thing to finish up a “peace deal” (which consisted of pulling out all troops in exchange for a promise the Taliban would continue terrorist attacks, but just a few here and there).

There is literally no limit to what Trump will now give away to China or Iran or North Korea to deliver a photo op for his increasingly dismal re-election campaign. Kori Schake of the International Institute for Strategic Studies observes that “because his hardline views were so well known, Bolton served an incredibly important purpose for President Trump, which was as shield against claims the administration was too yielding to our adversaries.” She adds, “It will be much harder for the president to defend his capitulations to Russia, North Korea, and Iran without Bolton in the administration.”

And, of course, it will not simply be the perception of critics; we already know Trump is all too willing to give up leverage for deals the contents of which he is ignorant and uninterested.

It remains a mystery why McMaster, Bolton, Coats, Mattis, Kelly and Rex Tillerson don’t come before Congress to explain to the American people that the president is unfit. If they think this will disturb allies, they are mistaken. Our allies already know that. If they think this hobbles Trump, one has to question at this point whether hobbling Trump is the patriotic thing to do.

Remaining silent enables his renomination and deprives voters of critical information. And it might just allow him another four years. When exactly do they tell us what they know — before or after the next Taliban invitation?

Jennifer Rubin writes for the Washington Post.



Recommended for you

(8) comments


Every ivy league college needs a Department of Sycophancy. It needs to be a doctoral level field of study.


Some people still can't get past Nov 2016. Sad.

hermit thrush

you're the one at the top of list!

your retort to any substantive matter which isn't flattering to trump is "neener neener, my guy won!"

it's a sign of a deeply rotten political movement.


Might makes right.


You have to remember Republicans believe in the traditional definition of marriage: when twice divorced man takes a date to a Jeffrey Epstein Party, and then leaves with Jeffrey Epstein Party with an illegal alien (Melania), dumping his date. When kids learn about the traditional definition of marriage that Republicans fought for, let’s hold the formation of Trumps third marriage in our hearts.

Holmes -- the real one

But Melania has brought us so much:

Be best.

Stop Cyber bullying.

And that great coat.


The man baby must be removed from office.

Holmes -- the real one


Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.