After a quiet summer and a clean campaign, things took a dramatic turn Wednesday.

Watertown mayoral candidate Jeffrey M. Smith appeared on WTNY/790-AM with morning host Alan Walts. Mr. Smith responded to questions about his campaign proposals as well as measures he supported when he served on the City Council.

Mr. Walts toward the end of the interview asked him to summarize why people should vote for him rather than either of his mayoral opponents, Allison I. Crossman or Councilman Cody J. Horbacz. While contrasting their differing positions, Mr. Smith relied on a worn-out, sexist cliché to demean his opponent.

“With all due respect, this is not a beauty contest,” Mr. Smith said, condescendingly referring to Mrs. Crossman.

Sorry, but there’s absolutely nothing respectful about such a bigoted comment. Would Mr. Smith ever feel comfortable saying this about a male rival? If not, does he believe that only women deserve to be marginalized for their appearance?

Mr. Smith contrasted his campaign platform with those of both Mrs. Crossman and Mr. Horbacz, and this is appropriate. Many of his positions differ substantially from the ones espoused by his competitors, and voters need to know where each candidate stands on the issues that matter most to them.

However, drudging up a chauvinistic stereotype about successful women is out of bounds.

If Mr. Smith has legitimate concerns over some of Mrs. Crossman’s declared positions, he doesn’t need to indulge in sexism. This undercuts the notion that he will be an effective community leader.

With less than a month to go before the general election, perhaps Mr. Smith is worried about Mrs. Crossman’s popularity. And he has good reason to look over his shoulder. Mrs. Crossman has raised significantly more money than he has in this race, according to information from the state Board of Elections.

Her fundraising efforts have so far netted $24,030. Mr. Smith has brought in $5,863, and Mr. Horbacz has raised $3,088.

It’s true that fundraising numbers don’t necessarily indicate who’s ahead in a particular campaign. But they demonstrate that a candidate’s message is resonating with voters, and Mrs. Crossman’s positions have struck a chord with many individuals.

It’s also true that Mrs. Crossman has contributed $4,500 to her campaign while her husband, Joseph, contributed $5,150. Their combined donations are $9,650.

But subtracting this number from Mrs. Crossman’s fundraising total of $24,030 leaves $14,380, more than twice what Mr. Smith has raised. There is obviously much more substance to her candidacy than the “beauty contest” narrative that her opponent has falsely conjured.

Campaigns should run on issues, and Mr. Smith is intelligent enough to know that. He can’t lose control when he’s under pressure.

How will he address Councilwoman Lisa A. Ruggiero when she pushes back against one of his proposals? By expressing himself in this way, he’s showing bias, sexism and that he’s out of touch on gender equality.

This race deserves better. Let’s get back to a respectful dialog on the issues. Just because disrespectful behavior is all over Washington, D.C., it doesn’t have to come to Watertown.

Johnson Newspapers 7.1


Recommended for you

(5) comments


When I first heard Smith's inappropriate and sexist comment, I thought it was a swipe at Crossman's beauty pageant history. Didn't she win Miss Thousand Islands several years ago? Didn't she go on to participate in the Miss New York State pageant? Wasn't Smith's comment meant to demean beauty pageants and Crossman's participation in them, and ultimately imply that she brings a lingering pageant-mindset to the mayoral election? Horrendous and cheap shot. Smith should explore the hard work and courage displayed by Crossman during her pageant years. Surely they have influenced the woman she is today. The question is what hasn't influenced Smith, leading to his sexism?

Holmes -- the real one

Maybe Jeffrey M. Smith can open a bar instead.


Well played sir...well played


Smith is an establishment conservative, Crossman is a Trump supporter, Horbacz is a center left(ish) democrat. With Olney out, the conservative vote will be split. However, Watertown skews right. So it's going to be a close touch and go. We'll see who gets past the post. Little things can matter.


Not that national policy preferences matter that much at local level, which is reflected in the wisdom of Watertown's rare non-partisan system, but it's easy to look up, and people still vote based on it.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.