When the state Legislature passed the Farm Laborers Fair Labor Practices Act last year, we lauded some of its worthy provisions on this page.

For one, it finally allowed farmworkers to collectively bargain for additional benefits. For decades, the State Employment Relations Act denied farm laborers this right.

So the bill addressed that long-overlooked problem, which is good. It also permits laborers to have at least one day of rest and mandates that they be paid overtime after 60 hours of work in a week’s time.

However, there were flaws in the legislation. It forces farmers to pay laborers time and a half if they choose to work on their designated day off even if they haven’t met the threshold for overtime.

It also creates a wage board, consisting of one representative each from the Farm Bureau, state AFL-CIO and member of the public. These boards can hold hearings to determine if they wish to recommend a lower cap on overtime hours, perhaps 40 hours rather than 60.

Based on this, we expressed our concern that the push for a 40-hour mandate would likely come before too long — and we were correct. The law took effect just a little more than a month ago, and union representatives are already calling for such a change in its overtime provision.

State Commissioner of Labor Roberta Reardon met Wednesday with members of the Lewis, Jefferson and St. Lawrence Counties Central Trades and Labor Council in Gouverneur. She attended the event to discuss Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s proposed budget.

Gouverneur Mayor Ronald P. McDougall, who serves as the labor council’s president, said some workers were being taken advantage of and that “big farmers” in Northern New York were putting up resistance to the farm legislation.

Ernest J. LaBaff is president emeritus of the Aluminum, Brink and Glassworkers International Union. He said the 60-hour overtime threshold is “making slaves out of those people,” a Watertown Daily Times story published Thursday reported.

The most presumptuous comment came from Jason A. Clark, the council’s recording secretary. In 2010, St. Lawrence County lost about 96 farms, he said. Now there are about seven farms that milk more than 2,500 cows apiece.

“I mean, that’s huge. And to Ernie’s point, that is corporate farming. This is not small town family dairy. This is a massive million dollar corporate operation,” Mr. Clark said. “These are folks that need a voice and they simply don’t have a voice otherwise. The extra $6 an hour for overtime at 40 hours, when you are a multi-million dollar operation, you can afford the extra kernels. It might not mean a lot to guy who has a $20 million farming operation. But that guy who is trying to buy Cheerios for his kid? It matters to him.”

Mr. Clark commits the same error that Mr. Cuomo does when the governor proposes sweeping changes to the state’s minimum wage, which must be borne by businesses. He presumes to know what additional expenses can be absorbed by individual farmers.

Regardless of their size, how does Mr. Clark know what increased wage costs can be supported by the dairy farmers in the north country? Just because they have multi-million dollar operations doesn’t mean they’re rolling in expendable cash.

These farmers cannot adjust to increased wages by raising the prices of their products. Their income is dependent upon the commodities market, which sets prices based on global demand.

State officials need to reject the call to lower the 60-hour overtime threshold. It’s only been in effect since Jan. 1, and we need more time to see if the provisions in place achieve their objectives.

Johnson Newspapers 7.1


Recommended for you

(5) comments


As for the employees, it is the life they have chosen.


Dude...no way. No one chooses to work extra for free. The Times is WAY off on this...as usual. I get running a business and costs. Believe me. NY continues to crush small business in so many ways the mass exodus continues of bright hard working entrepreneurs to more favorable states. And lord knows the overtime STATE employees basically steal in many state ran enterprises (corrections, etc.) But why is a farm laborer any different than anyone else?


I don't understand why a farm that needs more hours worked doesn't hire more people rather than asking the existing ones to work overtime. If you have 120 hours worth of work, hire 3 people and have them work 40 hours each instead of asking two people to work 60 hours. Even if this were maple, where the sap needs to be turned into syrup while it's flowing, you could have two people working eight hours a day instead of asking one to work 16 hours. It seems to me there is no scale at which there's an excuse to demand overtime work and not pay overtime for it. Maybe there's something I don't know, some way in which there are unexpected periods when a bunch of labor is suddenly needed and there's no time to hire more help. Somebody please explain why that peculiar industry hasn't priced in its troulbesomness so employees have to bear the burden rather than being compensated for the unusual nature of the work they do.


Never ran a business, I see.


Why is farm labor in a different category from any other job?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.