Stefanik should release her Jan. 6 records

This year, as the holiday approaches, something our whole community should be grateful for is President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better agenda. What we shouldn’t be grateful for is U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik who voted against both parts of the agenda.

Why did she vote against bringing New York state at least $13.5 billion for roads and bridges, $9.8 billion for public transportation, $685 million for airports, $2.6 billion for clean drinking water and $100 million for broadband internet access? Why did she vote against the social infrastructure bill, one that is fully funded and reduces the deficit? It will bring significant benefits to New Yorkers including pre-K to almost 300,000 more kids, get affordable child care to families of 1 million children; make health care more affordable for hundreds of thousands including 163,000 uninsured; and expand rental assistance for the nearly 2 million people who spend more than 30% of their income on rent.

The package includes important benefits for older residents like me. The final version is expected to include three important gains:

n It invests $89 billion in a new Medicare benefit for hearing care to begin in 2023, including coverage of prescribed hearing aids under Medicare Part B.

n It will lower the cost of prescription drugs, capping total Medicare drug coverage out of pocket costs to $2,000 and ensuring that insulin costs no more than $35 per month. It will lower Medicare prices on a small number of high cost prescription medicines by 2025 by negotiating rather than unilaterally decisions by the drug corporations. It will penalize drug manufacturers that price gouge.

n It will address the existing backlog of people on waiting lists for home care services.

These investments are lifesaving and will allow older residents to age with the dignity they so deserve. But Rep. Stefanik would deny us these measures.

I really wish she would put the good of our community first by supporting these historic investments which will help make the north country a place where we can all thrive. Instead, she has put partisanship first — not much to be thankful for.

Linda Wilkinson

Potsdam

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Johnson Newspapers 7.1

Recommended for you

(5) comments

Schmett Malone

She voted no because she does not care about her constituents, full stop. She would rather spend time (and money) in Florida with the "biggest loser" than with the small businesses in her district that voted for her. People in the Adirondacks need to stop thinking she cares about them; she does not.

KRobbins

Some might say Stefanik’s vote was on principle except that she doesn’t have any. Other than to be a star on rightwing media and social media. In that, she’s no different from those in the Q caucus.

Djp29d

LGB

hermit thrush

the republican political class hates democrats more than they love our country.

Joseph Savoca

"Why did she vote against...?"

Because Trump supporters are full of hate.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.